On 2007-12-07, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > you see no reason, why a ntp-client that does not serve its time to > someone else should have a local clock configured? > did i get this right?
The only reason to use the Undisciplined Local Clock (127.127.1.x) is on an ntpd which must be able to serve time to others even when there are no real time sources available. The Undiciplined Local Clock is not a time source and does nothing to keep ntpd synchronised. > does anyone of you have details regarding my original question: > How can i find out which of the sanity-checks failed? I don't think you can. > -----Original Message----- > [---=| TOFU protection by t-prot: 100 lines snipped |=---] Oh, that's what you were replying to. -- Steve Kostecke <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> NTP Public Services Project - http://support.ntp.org/ _______________________________________________ questions mailing list questions@lists.ntp.org https://lists.ntp.org/mailman/listinfo/questions
