MI5 Persecution Update: Friday 30 April,. 1999 If You Intend To Reply,. Please Read This Please.... keep your response to one page!. Faxes. over a page or two will be deleted without. being read.
Somewhere between 0 and. 100% The last few days there have. been no clear recordable instances of abuse. However, while travelling. on the Underground, while walking around near my home and going to friends homes, I am constantly. troubled by thoughts that those people over there might be about to get at me;. that the couple sitting in the opposite seats laughing are. in fact laughing at me; et. cetera, et cetera. A comment by a scientist to the BSE. inquiry sticks in my mind. He described the possible scale of the epidemic as. "between 0% and 100%". It might not be happening, it might not happen at. all, to any discernable degree.... or it might be. total. Without clear recording, which seems to have become impossible the last couple of. weeks, there is no way of knowing. whether the harassment really is continuing, whether we have entered. a temporary hiatus, or whether perhaps it has perhaps stopped for now. But for the time being I think there arent any reasons to dicontinue. these faxes. I only re-started them six weeks ago in response to. a resumption of MI5 harassment; and I. think I will need to be more convinced of absence of persecution. before I discontinue my complaints. The Newscasters. are still watching In the last few weeks there have. been at least a couple of fairly overt instances of "interactive watching". by newscasters. I reported this in a previous. "MI5 Persecution Update". These instances are really very. rare compared to 1990-91, when there were many dozens of such occurrences. Undoubtedly the reduction. is due to my practice of videotaping everything I see. Recently I. had the opportunity of showing this years "happenings" (Jon Snow/Nicholas Witchell). to my psychiatrist, and. he agreed that in both cases the newscasters were expressing. merriment without visible cause, and that objectively it might be possible for my claims to be. true - although of course other people reported similar. thoughts to him, and this thinking is usually a symptom of. illness. Read About. the MI5 Persecution on the World Wide Web The March 1998 issue (number 42) of .net Magazine reviews. the website describing it as an "excellent site". Since. August 11, 1996 over 50,000 people have. browsed this website. You are encouraged to read the web. pages which include a FAQ (frequently asked questions) section. outlining the nature of the persecutors, their methods of harassment. through the media, people at work and among. the general public an. evidence section, which carries audio and video clips of media and workplace harassment, rated according to how directly I. think they refer to me objective descriptions of the. state security agencies involved scanned texts of the complaints I. have made to media and state security agencies. involved posts which have been made to. netnews over the last four years on this topic Keith Hill MP (Labour -. Streatham), my elected representative, as ever refuses to. help. MI5 Waste Taxpayer. Millions on Pointless Hate-Campaign Recently I was talking to an independent. observer about the nature and purpose of the perceived campaign of persecution against me. The. person I spoke to,. a highly intelligent man, said he was struck by the utter pointlessness of the perceived campaign. against me. He also said that, if my theories were in fact true, many people would have to. be involved, in the surveillance itself, and in the technical side of the delivery. of information. from my home to TV studios for example, if the "interactive watching" were happening as described.. He voiced these thoughts without any prompting from me; but both I and other observers had arrived. at pretty much the same conclusions, some years. ago. I saw a team of four men at Toronto Airport in. 1993 To carry out the surveillance alone, full-time, would. employ four or five men, or their equivalent in terms of man-hours. Each man would "work". an eight-hour shift, so you would need at least three. men doing the surveillance, plus a connecting link /. manager. An indicator that this estimate. is correct arrived in 1993, when I was accosted by one of a group of four men at Toronto. Airport; he said, laughing, "if he tries to run away well find him". Plainly these were the men who had been. involved in the intrusive surveillance of me for the. preceding three years. On other occasions, I have seen the same man. on two or three occasions. On one such occasion, at Ottawas Civic Hospital in. November 1996; he gave his name to the doctor as "Alan Holdsworth" or. some such; my hearing is not very good sometimes and I am not sure of the. surname, although I am sure "Alan" was his first name.. I saw exactly the same man again in Ottawa, at the airport, in July 1998. Obviously, other people. must be "working" with this. person; he would not be the sole agent employed in this case. Usenet readers views on the Cost to MI5 of. Running the Campaign Here's what a couple of other. people on internet newsgroups / Usenet (uk.misc) had to say regarding the cost of. running such an operation... PO: >Have some sense, grow up. and smell reality. What you are talking about PO: >would take loads of planning, tens of thousands of pounds and. lots of PO:. >people involved in the planning, execution and maintenance of it. You PO: >must have a. very high opinion of yourself to think you are worth it. and...... PM: >But why? And why. you? Do you realize how much it would cost to keep PM: >one person under continuous surveillance. for five years? Think about PM: >all the man/hours. Say they _just_ allocated. a two man team and a PM: >supervisor. OK., Supervisor's salary, say, #30,000 a. year. Two men, PM: >#20,000 a year each.. But they'd need to work in shifts -- so it would PM:. >be six men at #20,000 (which with on-costs would work out at more like PM: >#30,000 to. the employer.) PM:. > PM:. >So, we're talking #30,000 x 6. #180,000. plus say, #40,000 for the PM: >supervisor.. #220,000. Then you've got the hardware involved. And PM: >any transcription that needs doing. You. don't think the 'Big Boss' PM: >would listen to hours and. hours of tapes, do you. PM:. > PM: >So, all in all, you. couldn't actually do the job for much less than PM: >a quarter million a year. Over. five years. What are you doing that makes PM: >it worth the while of the state. to spend over one and a quarter million PM:. >on you? Those are pretty much the sort of calculations that went. through my head once I stopped to consider what it must. be costing them to run this operation. At the very least, a quarter million a year - and probably. much more, given the intrusive and. human-resource-intensive methods employed. Times nine. years. Equals well over two million pounds - and probably much, much. more. Its wasteful for someone with. my skills to be unemployed The wastefulness of the MI5 campaign against. me is not just that of futile expenditure on their side.. It is also extremely wasteful for someone with my talents to be unemployed and on. a disability pension. I am highly qualified in. numerate disciplines, yet am unable to work, specifically because of the MI5 hate-campaign. against me. It is a terrible waste of resources for. a supposedly efficient economy like that of the UK to be squandering the talents. of a skilled and capable worker. I made every effort to remain in employment. for as long as I could, but ultimately I was defeated by MI5s employment. of massive resources specifically targeted on my. workplaces with the sole aim of seeing me evicted from those. workplaces. You might expect this sort of behaviour from the Stasi or some other secret police force in a communist. country where labour. is cheap, and the governments aim on seeing its citizens confined; but for a. supposedly free and efficient economy like Britains, the wastefulness resulting both directly and indirectly from. the Security Services activities is simply criminal, and should never be. allowed. The international. dimension means the costs are multiplied many times overoer. had any sense, then they have surely taken leave of them over the last. nine years. Four. years of persecution in Canada The persecution re-started within less than five minutes of my arrival. in Canada, as documented above, and in. the "frequently asked questions" article on the website. The words, "if he tries to. run away well. find him" spoken by one of the harassers at Toronto Airport are now imprinted on. my mind. A year later I emigrated. to Canada, intending to find a job and settle there, hoping that MI5s interest in me might dim with time. I. did manage to find work there, but my hopes of avoiding Security. Service interest were ground into dust. As detailed above, I saw the same man. in November 1996 and July 1998, both times in. Ottawa. Apart from these encounters, there were numerous incidents between 1994 and 1998 of harassment, of. an identical nature and. in most cases using identical words to what had occurred in the UK. It became quite clear to. me that the permanent surveillance and harassment operation which MI5 had subjected me to. in England was. being continued. For a team of four or five men to be. employed overseas must cost a lot more than if they operate in their home country. And for. MI5 to continue the operation for a period of over four years, continuously, must. cost many hundreds of thousands of pounds. This confirms my. belief that the state is funding the campaign against mehat the Security Service. receives current annual. funding of #160M. Divided by 1850 staff, works out at #86,000. But. the unit annual cost of each "watcher" must be much higher than this, especially. given the frequently mobile and overseas nature of their actions of the last few years. A very conservative figure might be. a little over #100,000 pa for each of a team. of five people, or half a million pounds per year. For nine. years, so far. So the most conservative estimate of the surveillance element alone is perhaps four. or five million pounds since. 1990. This guesstimate is of course. theoretical - I am not privy to inside details of how MI5 split their. funding. But to take some other examples, the cost of a US. counter-surveillance specialist per day is USD 5,000. Even if the. agents permanently assigned to me are not of this calibre - even if they employ specialists. when difficult work planting bugs etc is encountered - their. salary and support costs must still be very high. The individual agents are doing well for themselves as. they are well-paid to exercise psychopathic. instincts which in any sane society would see them in prison;. but the taxpayers who must fund this terribly wasteful exercise are being "done" out. of hundreds of thousands of pounds each. year. It must be. emphasised that the above estimates are highly conservative. Besides the surveillance. operation, it must carry a high cost in man-hours to propagate covert slanders through the population;. to setup and maintain the "interactive. watching" links to TV and radio stations, which these organisations. continue desparately to "lie and deny";. and to induce antipathy in co-workers which would not otherwise exist. Why they are wasting Millions of Pounds on a "Nobody. from South London" As remarked in the. prologue to this article, it is really most extraordinary that. the Security Service spends a chunk of its budget, every year for nine years so far, on a. meaningless campaign against a "nobody from South London". That they are spending such a. large amount of money has been. confirmed to me on several occasions, usually by oblique references to "its costing. this country millions". The supposed "logic" behind the. persecution is that MI5 wish to avoid their harassment of me, and the. involvement of the UK media, to be made public; yet as the reader will appreciate that is a circular. argument, "theyre doing it because they want to keep it. secret and avoid humiliation for themselves and. their country" begs the question, "why did they start doing it in the first place?", to which in truth I myself do not. know the answer. Plainly MI5 with its rich budget can. afford half a million pounds a year to waste on a "nobody from South London". Some time ago I was talking to. a British surveillance professional on Compuserve. who told me "this work costs a lot of money and. is usally because the person I am following has done something (usually criminal) to warrant all this money. and time being spent." Yet in this. particular case it is plainly not the "victims fault" that the harassment is taking place. The hate-campaign. against me is completely the creation of the obsessive psychologies of the MI5. agents who have. made themselves my persecutors; it is obviously a "personal" campaign for them, and. for years they misuse taxpayer funding to feed their insane, unnatural and fixated. fantasies. 1949 _______________________________________________ questions mailing list questions@lists.ntp.org https://lists.ntp.org/mailman/listinfo/questions