David, Cite: Judah Levine of NIST, personal communication. A few little mistakes on my part proved him right.
Dave [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > In comp.protocols.time.ntp you write: > > Hi Dave, > >> We can argue about the Hurst parameter, which can't be truly random-walk >> as I have assumed, but the approximation is valid up to lag times of at >> least a week. However, as I have been cautioned, these plots are really >> sensitive to spectral lines due to nonuniform sampling. I was very >> careful to avoid such things. > > > Do you have a cite for that? > > Have you seen Vit Klemes take on tree ring data: > > http://iahs.info/perugia/2007IAHSKlemesTreeRings.pdf > > It might appeal to your sense of humour. > > David. _______________________________________________ questions mailing list questions@lists.ntp.org https://lists.ntp.org/mailman/listinfo/questions
