>>> In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Serge Bets <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
David> I don't believe it would be safe to start ntpd in normal mode within David> that period. Serge> Indeed: the daemon then behaves strangely, not sane at all. Last year Serge> I published here an awk script calling ntpd -gq and then sleeping Serge> until an eventual slew is finished. After that, normal mode ntpd can Serge> be started safely. And of course the daemon really appreciates to Serge> startup with a near-zero initial phase offset. 1) what are you trying to accomplish by the sequence: ntpd -gq ; wait a bit; ntpd that you do not get with: ntpd -g ; ntp-wait 2) there have been recent changes to the initial frequency/offset situation with ntp-dev. Have you tried the latest code to see how it behaves? -- Harlan Stenn <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> http://ntpforum.isc.org - be a member! _______________________________________________ questions mailing list questions@lists.ntp.org https://lists.ntp.org/mailman/listinfo/questions
