Noob wrote: > Unruh wrote: > >> SNTP is a client protocol, not a server, according to RFC. > > You keep saying that. Which RFC are you referring to? >
SNTP is defined in the NTPv4 draft in http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-ietf-ntp-ntpv4-proto-09.txt in section 14. You can also look at RFC 4330 but that's about to be obsoleted by the NTPv4 draft. SNTP is *not* a client protocol. >> We have absolutely no idea what you are running on all your machines. You >> never told us. This was an assumption based on the weird conditions you >> stated. It really really helps if you give information when you ask for >> help so that the help may actually be helpful. Tell us what your system is, >> what "SNTP program" you are using as the server, what the other client >> machines on the lan are running. > > The only client is an x86 PC running Linux 2.6.22.1-rt9 (i.e. with > real-time extensions) and ntpd [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > The server is an embedded device (HEOL-T101) with a GPS receiver and a > Fast Ethernet port. I have no idea what operating system runs on the > device; there might not even be an OS. The manufacturer claims the > device implements SNTPv4 instead of the full NTP. > > ( http://www.heoldesign.com/index.php?id=58 ) > Since it hads a GPS receiver in it, it only needs the SNTP part of the spec and be an SNTP server. See the NTPv4 draft. Danny _______________________________________________ questions mailing list questions@lists.ntp.org https://lists.ntp.org/mailman/listinfo/questions