David Woolley wrote: > Depends on interrupt latency, network loading, the total lack of any > Windows machines in the time synchronisation chain, etc. 100ns should > be possible for lightly loaded machines on a lightly loaded network, at > least 90% of the time.
Sorry. I got 100 microseconds and 100 ns mixed up. However, whilst 100 microseconds is rather easier to achieve, if you want 100% reliability, I still think the common PPS line would be advisable. Caveats about Windows still apply. _______________________________________________ questions mailing list questions@lists.ntp.org https://lists.ntp.org/mailman/listinfo/questions
