>>> In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Unruh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Unruh> ntpdate serves a useful purpose, something which ntpd -g -q does not Unruh> do (because for the purpose of setting the clock in a one-shot Unruh> manner, ntpd is seriously flawed, especially if the clock is already Unruh> within 128ms of the correct time). Now, sntp should be equally Unruh> seriously flawed, since the suggestion in the rfc is that it use the Unruh> same algorithm for clock setting as ntp uses I certainly would not Unruh> overload the name sntp with yet another operating mode. It's comments like this that cause me to wonder if you are just being a troll, and to wonder if I should invest effort in responding. I certainly wonder what your goal is by writing things like this. -- Harlan Stenn <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> http://ntpforum.isc.org - be a member! _______________________________________________ questions mailing list [email protected] https://lists.ntp.org/mailman/listinfo/questions
