On Sat, 3 Jan 2009, Danny Mayer wrote: > Unruh wrote: >> George R. Kasica <geor...@netwrx1.com> writes: >> >>> On Fri, 02 Jan 2009 14:31:34 +0100, Rob van der Putten <r...@sput.nl> >>> wrote: >> >>>> Hi there >>>> >>>> >>>> Steve Kostecke wrote: >>>> >>>>> All my Linux systems had a fine time. None of them locked up / crashed / >>>>> rebooted / etc. >>>>> >>>>> The kernels involved included: >>>>> >>>>> 2.6.24-etchnhalf.1-amd64 >>>>> 2.6.18-5-486 >>>>> 2.6.16-2-486 >>>>> 2.6.18-5-k7 >>>>> 2.6.18-4-powerpc >>>>> 2.4.16-k7 >>>> What about the hardware (Intel /AMD)? >> >>> Rob: >> >>> Everything in my post above was Intel based, no AMD or otherwise. >> >> Why in the world would you then have an amd64 kerenl and two k7 kernels, >> and one powerpc kernel? None of those is intel. >> > > He *never* said that. Those are Steve's systems. The post even includes > that fact.
Ooops. My mistake-- not reading th > properly > > Danny > -- William G. Unruh | Canadian Institute for| Tel: +1(604)822-3273 Physics&Astronomy | Advanced Research | Fax: +1(604)822-5324 UBC, Vancouver,BC | Program in Cosmology | un...@physics.ubc.ca Canada V6T 1Z1 | and Gravity | www.theory.physics.ubc.ca/ _______________________________________________ questions mailing list questions@lists.ntp.org https://lists.ntp.org/mailman/listinfo/questions
