On Mar 12, 8:28 pm, "David J Taylor" <david-tay...@blueyonder.neither- this-bit.nor-this.co.uk> wrote: > Dave Hart wrote: > > On Mar 12, 8:12 pm, "David J Taylor" <david-tay...@blueyonder.neither- > > this-bit.nor-this.co.uk> wrote: > >> Dave Hart wrote: > >>> It looks like you've found a documentation omission. > > >> Thanks, Dave. As you have the code to hand, could you report it as a > >> bug? > > > Sure. Where did you find the slightly inadequate description of space > > in the first character of the peers billboard lines? > > The only table I can find on the official site is: > > http://www.cis.udel.edu/~mills/ntp/html/decode.html > > where the description is: "discarded as not valid (TEST10-TEST13)"
Does it also have a more detailed description of TEST12? > Search Google with the exact phrase: "The peer is discarded as > unreachable, synchronized to this server (synch loop) or outrageous > synchronization distance." and you get three pages of hits. These appear > to refer to the man page for ntpq(8) which I don't have. I believe the reference NTP source does not include man pages, so I don't think a http://bugs.ntp.org/ report would be useful. You might check http://support.ntp.org/ to see if there's something you can add or correct there about peers billboard sync codes. However, both sites are currently inaccessible to me, which I reported to webmas...@ntp.org but that mail may be hosted on the same unreachable machine. From three test locations I reach an ISC router responding host unreachable which I think means the connectivity is fine but the host isn't. I'll forward the report on to a few selected n...@ntp.org email addresses. Cheers, Dave Hart _______________________________________________ questions mailing list questions@lists.ntp.org https://lists.ntp.org/mailman/listinfo/questions
