Joseph Gwinn wrote: >>> The FAQ has to be the place for such explanations. >> I'm not sure if this qualifies as an FAQ as I don't recall that it has >> come up before. FAQ stands for Frequently Asked Questions. > > RAQ then? Rarely Asked Questions > > Seriously, I can't believe that I'm the only person in history to be > perplexed by these status codes, and those little three-word summaries > are a bit telegraphic. > > Joe Gwinn >
You aren't the only one. These questions have been asked before by a number of people. In fact I had to look at this at one point when I was getting these codes. Of course I just looked at the source code and never looked for documentation. I will tell you that this is a combination of bits so it's not just a number. Each bit represents a test code that failed so you have quite a bit to look at. Danny -- This message has been scanned for viruses and dangerous content by MailScanner, and is believed to be clean. _______________________________________________ questions mailing list questions@lists.ntp.org https://lists.ntp.org/mailman/listinfo/questions
