Joseph Gwinn wrote: > In article <49becf09$0$507$5a6ae...@news.aaisp.net.uk>, > David Woolley <da...@ex.djwhome.demon.co.uk.invalid> wrote: > >> Joseph Gwinn wrote: >>> We have moved from the meaning of status code 9514 to the more general >> But you should have kept the thread, even if the subject changed. > > Opinion varies on this, but why? It really was a case of topic drift.
Because it avoids the need to quote large amounts of back context and it is how USENET works (you may be using an email gateway). > > True. But it can be amusing to figure out which one it is, and start to > ask uncomfortable questions about how can they be better than free, > especially if they reduced the usefulness of the code. What is typically being sold is de-skilling, and convincing the, not very technical, manager that he understands it. _______________________________________________ questions mailing list questions@lists.ntp.org https://lists.ntp.org/mailman/listinfo/questions
