"David Woolley" <da...@ex.djwhome.demon.co.uk.invalid> skrev i meddelelsen news:4a0ab078$0$513$5a6ae...@news.aaisp.net.uk... > Towli wrote: > >> Therefore my core switches choose to trust the to more agreeing servers >> as opposed to my internal server, which is quite alone in its view on the >> time and whose time differs from the 2, due to the closer proximity >> /smaller delay. > > In principle that can happen, however I think it normally produces an > insane, rather than an invalid status. If you had used a current version > of ntpd, the rv <association> output would have told you in rather more > detail why the server was rejected. > >>> #sh ntp ass de > > What command are you running?
Show ntp association detail - sry and thanks for enlightenment! /T _______________________________________________ questions mailing list questions@lists.ntp.org https://lists.ntp.org/mailman/listinfo/questions
