"Richard B. Gilbert" <rgilber...@comcast.net> writes: >David Woolley wrote: >> David J Taylor wrote: >>> John Hasler wrote: >>> [] >>>> The Chrony source is available under the GPL. I'm sure someone would >>>> be willing to port it for you for suitable compensation. >>> >>> If I were paying my money, I would rather it went towards improving >>> the official NTP, to be honest. >> >> Such improvements are unlikely as it turns out that the subject of this >> thread is an area where Dave Mills refuses to acknowledge a problem.
>There is no problem unless you insist on shutting down your system >frequently. I disagree. a) Some people have no choice. They must shut down their system frequently. They do not "insist" on it, anymore than you insist on breathing. b)There is a problem even without that. TEsts I did showed that chrony has a better clock discipline by about a factor of 3. Lichvar claims that running a gps refclock with chrony vs ntp, chrony does better by a factor of 20 using the same poll interval. Now, if you believe that ntp being suboptimal by a factor of 3 or 20 indicates "no problem", .... >The subject line seems poorly worded. There is no question of honesty >or dishonesty in the usual sense of those words. _______________________________________________ questions mailing list questions@lists.ntp.org https://lists.ntp.org/mailman/listinfo/questions