"Why Tea" <[email protected]> wrote in message news:42f094fd-c09f-4e4b-9ee8-ab2b843e1...@k13g2000prh.googlegroups.com... [] > 1) Has anybody used Windows 2003 as an ntp server and > is happy/unhappy with it?
I am happy with Windows 2000 and Windows XP - Windows Server 2003 is a hybrid of those OSes and I would /expect/ it to be fine. I've been using a serial GPS/PPS source as my primary reference. How many clients are you expecting to serve? > 2) If I were to do a trial run of ntpd on Windows 2003, how do > I measure its ntpd performance in order to make a > judgment? I use MRTG, Meinberg's monitor, and my own NTP Plotter package. > 3) I've downloaded the Mienberg ntp package and installed > it. How I judge it's performance? > > Thanks for all suggestions/advice. > > /Why Tea See: NTP Plotter: http://www.satsignal.eu/software/net.htm#NTPplotter Meinberg Time Server Monitor: http://www.meinberg.de/english/sw/time-server-monitor.htm MRTG: http://www.satsignal.eu/ntp/NTPandMRTG.html Sample results: http://www.satsignal.eu/mrtg/daily_ntp.html Cheers, David _______________________________________________ questions mailing list [email protected] https://lists.ntp.org/mailman/listinfo/questions
