lhommedumatch wrote:
On 13 avr, 00:44, David Lord <sn...@lordynet.org> wrote:
lhommedumatch wrote:
I'm working on a oceanographic vessel
ntpgmtaceb is our reference clock that is synchronised with a gps at
the beginning of a cruise.
The drift of this clock is <1ms each day.
It's connected on the lan board of our vessel.
I have removed these two lines
server 127.127.1.0
fudge   127.127.1.0 stratum 10
Then:
service ntpd stop
ntpdate ntpgmtaceb
12 Apr 21:46:22 ntpdate[9860]: adjust time server 192.168.21.5 offset
-0.000252
sec
service ntp start
ntpq -p
     remote           refid      st t when poll reach   delay
offset  jitter
==============================================================================
*ntpgmtaceb      .1PPS.           1 u   20   64  377    0.144
-0.373   0.863
So it's seems to be really better, isn't it?
Delay on that connection is 0.144 vs 29.431 your original message
so it's probably "better" because of that rather than removal of
LOCAL(0). If original figure from delay was correct, eg due to
network load, then you'd need to get that fixed.

If using a recent ntpd you can have "tos orphan 10" to fallback
to local clock if it's sufficiently reliable, and other tos
options to set limits on what time if any is accepted and reported.

What version of ntpd are you running?

David

I'm using ntpd 4.2.2p1

I have 4.2.0-r which doesn't support the options I mentioned,
4.2.4p2-o here has some of them and other options have been
added for more recent versions.


David

_______________________________________________
questions mailing list
questions@lists.ntp.org
http://lists.ntp.org/listinfo/questions

Reply via email to