On Tue, Mar 08, 2011 at 05:00:44PM +0000, unruh wrote: > >>>> filtoffset= 67671.8 66534.8 65931.3 65118.0 63317.3 63029.5 62216.4 > >>>> 58156.6,
> Not at all sure how Mills comes into the picture. On a system where the > frequency fluctuates wildly, ntpd is not the right answer, nor is any > system. I suspect that the best you could do would be to run something > like ntpdate often and jump the clock around. The frequency offset in this case seems to be around 2% which is still well below the 10% maximum Linux can adjust. I'd try chrony before resorting to ntpdate, the timekeeping probably won't be very good, but at least the clock won't be stepped. -- Miroslav Lichvar _______________________________________________ questions mailing list questions@lists.ntp.org http://lists.ntp.org/listinfo/questions
