On 2011-04-18, E-Mail Sent to this address will be added to the BlackLists <Null@BlackList.Anitech-Systems.invalid> wrote: > unruh wrote: >> C BlacK wrote: >>> Why would it take ntpd ten hours to achieve its accuracy? >> chrony which operates much more rapidly > > ... and then there is radclock, which is supposed to beat > ntpd, chrony and PTP in convergence & stability?
Since they do not test it against chrony, from what I can see, It is unclear why you say it beats it. In fact I suspect it would not. But it would be a nice experiment to try. Note that I ran chrony and compared chrony over an ADSL line from an ntpd server fed from a GPS with a local GPS, and chrony gave accuracies of the order of 10us, just as they are getting. > Can be run alongside NTP? Its reported to work better with VM? > Again it only supports Linux & FreeBSD? ><www.cubinlab.ee.unimelb.edu.au/radclock/> > > _______________________________________________ questions mailing list questions@lists.ntp.org http://lists.ntp.org/listinfo/questions
