On Fri, Apr 22, 2011 at 09:48 AM, "Roger" <[email protected]> wrote: > I've seen these number quoted before and I don't understand > the last one. Why doesn't 6 allow for the failure of 3? Why > doesn't 7 allow for the failure of 4? Assuming that this > wasn't a mistake in the dim and distant past which keeps > on being repeated what am I missing?
Consider that "failure" here encompasses "serves bogus time". Suppose you have 7 sources configured and 4 of them cluster nicely around an incorrect time, with 3 clustered around UTC. Cheers, Dave Hart _______________________________________________ questions mailing list [email protected] http://lists.ntp.org/listinfo/questions
