Thanks Dave, My understanding was backwards. Your reference set me straight.
Ed Sent: Wednesday, May 18, 2011 9:30 AM To: Mischanko, Edward T Cc: Miroslav Lichvar; questions@lists.ntp.org Subject: Re: [ntp:questions] Loop Filter Gains vs. Polling Interval On Wed, May 18, 2011 at 2:21 PM, Mischanko, Edward T wrote: > Miroslav, > > I'm a little confused. I set the Allan intercept, as you suggested, but > when you say FLL didn't you mean PLL? Thanks for your help. Miroslav's references to FLL (frequency-locked loop) were correct. Please see: http://www.eecis.udel.edu/~mills/ntp/html/discipline.html which explains the hybrid PLL/FLL clock discipline algorithm. Miroslav's suggestion would increase the FLL effect at a lower poll interval/time constant compared to the default. Cheers, Dave Hart _______________________________________________ questions mailing list questions@lists.ntp.org http://lists.ntp.org/listinfo/questions
