Il 04/10/2011 14:53, Dave Hart ha scritto: > I wish you were. :) Ouch!
> The bit assignments for peer events and system > events were reworked in the 4.2.5 cycle (2007-2009 basically). It > appears to me the changes overlooked the 4 bits each is allocated in > the status words, with the result the peer and system events numbered > 16 show up in the status word the same as the events numbered 0. Ouch again!!! > Both sets need to either go on a diet and lose one event code, Actually not. For the peer status word, it is enough to renumber code 10 to 00, which was left out. Unless this breaks something else, of course. > Thanks for reporting the contradiction. NP, really. Thank you for letting me know I wasn't overlooking something obvious. > Please consider filing a bug > report at http://bugs.ntp.org/ Will do. Ciao -- bronto _______________________________________________ questions mailing list [email protected] http://lists.ntp.org/listinfo/questions
