> -----Original Message----- > From: questions- > bounces+edward.mischanko=arcelormittal....@lists.ntp.org > [mailto:questions- > bounces+edward.mischanko=arcelormittal....@lists.ntp.org] On > Behalf Of David Woolley > Sent: Thursday, December 20, 2012 2:05 AM > To: questions@lists.ntp.org > Subject: Re: [ntp:questions] Clock Offset > > Mischanko, Edward T wrote: > > > > > Notice individual selected peers have positive offsets, but my > clock offset after averaging is negative? > > > > I think the ntpq peers display gives the most recent offset, but > the > averaging uses the best of the last 8. > > _______________________________________________ > questions mailing list > questions@lists.ntp.org > http://lists.ntp.org/listinfo/questions [Mischanko, Edward T]
David, Thank you for your reply. This certainly explains the differences, but this would seem to raise another question. Any correction in frequency would have to come from the most current average of offsets, not the last 8? Otherwise, how can NTP keep up with the changes in a high jitter situation? Regards, Ed _______________________________________________ questions mailing list questions@lists.ntp.org http://lists.ntp.org/listinfo/questions
