> > Yes, I meant try "interface ignore lo0" > instead of "interface ignore lo". > > For that matter try "interface ignore ipv4"? >
I will try this > > > What version of ntpd are you running 4.2.7p359? > Not this one. I'm not on the machine now but it was the latest code one week back, maybe 4.2.7p357 > > BTW, I think you are chasing a lost cause. > > > from the responses i start to think that this scenario is not supposed to be implemented and I'm trying to figure out why (and to find another solution). _______________________________________________ questions mailing list questions@lists.ntp.org http://lists.ntp.org/listinfo/questions
