Martin Burnicki <martin.burni...@meinberg.de> wrote:
> Rob wrote:
>> Only the shared memory interface currently has functionality like this,
>> and it has some limitations in the information it can convey. If this
>> interface is improved, all the local clock drivers can be moved out
>> into separate processes and everyone can tinker his driver to fix problems
>> like this one. It will also be easier to release a fixed driver once
>> a problem like this suddenly appears.
>
> Once upon a time there was a good proposal for a new SHM interface with
> improved features. However, this was not accepted, and the discussion
> simply faded out. See:
> http://lists.ntp.org/pipermail/questions/2011-March/028913.html
Notice how it was simply waved away with a
"you want a new driver? forget it!"
remark. Very constructive indeed, mr Mills.
_______________________________________________
questions mailing list
questions@lists.ntp.org
http://lists.ntp.org/listinfo/questions
