On 2014-12-11 13:46, Rob wrote: > A C <agcarver+...@acarver.net> wrote: >> On 2014-12-11 12:33, Rob wrote: >>> A C <agcarver+...@acarver.net> wrote: >>>> On 2014-12-11 11:03, Paul wrote: >>>>> On Thu, Dec 11, 2014 at 11:14 AM, Sander Smeenk <ssme...@freshdot.net> >>>>> wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> But i'm quite sure driver 22 is compiled in the binary i'm running. >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> Almost certainly not. Debian derived distos using upstream ntp don't have >>>>> PPS support. However it's fairly trivial to compile and if you use the >>>>> reference package you'll get the latest release and it will install with >>>>> the distro version. The only glitch is timepps.h since they choose not to >>>>> include it in the reference source release. It's in the pps-tools >>>>> repository at GitHub. >>>> >>>> Debian wheezy's packaged ntpd does include PPS support. I am currently >>>> running ntpd from that stable repository and running the ATOM refclock >>>> (22). The pps-tools package is also available in the repository for >>>> direct installation. >>> >>> That must be new. There was no PPS support in the Wheezy binaries a >>> couple of months ago. A bug about this was filed, but nothing happened. >> >> I've only been running PPS disciplined ntpd on Debian since June so I >> didn't pay attention to the lack of PPS prior to that point however the >> latest binary says it was compiled in August. The only other system I >> used with PPS was NetBSD and there I was compiling the kernel and ntpd. >> >> Linux netclock2 3.2.0-4-686-pae #1 SMP Debian 3.2.63-2+deb7u1 i686 GNU/Linux >> >> $ ntpq -c rv >> associd=0 status=0115 leap_none, sync_pps, 1 event, clock_sync, >> version="ntpd 4.2.6p5@1.2349-o Sat Aug 9 08:39:56 UTC 2014 (1)", >> processor="i686", system="Linux/3.2.0-4-686-pae", leap=00, stratum=1, >> precision=-20, rootdelay=0.000, rootdisp=0.445, refid=PPS, >> reftime=d8348730.416a1068 Thu, Dec 11 2014 13:12:16.255, >> clock=d834873e.a2ba6271 Thu, Dec 11 2014 13:12:30.635, peer=61736, tc=4, >> mintc=3, offset=0.001, frequency=-124.653, sys_jitter=0.002, >> clk_jitter=0.002, clk_wander=0.001 > > Interesting. Mine says: > version="ntpd 4.2.6p5@1.2349-o Sat May 12 09:07:18 UTC 2012 (1)", > > Same version, different compilation date, no PPS. And it does not get > updated by apt-get update/upgrade. > > You are sure you did not compile it yourself? Compiling the source > package on a system where pps-tools is installed fixes the problem > automagically. It is only a build problem. >
Well that explains the date. I completely forgot about downloading the source package (not the source tarball) from the repository and rebuilding the .deb locally. I had to do a disk search when you mentioned that just in case. Sure enough: -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 1143702 Aug 9 01:30 ntp-doc_4.2.6.p5+dfsg-2_all.deb And it has the same date as the compiled binary. _______________________________________________ questions mailing list questions@lists.ntp.org http://lists.ntp.org/listinfo/questions
