On 2015-02-16, David Taylor <david-tay...@blueyonder.co.uk.invalid> wrote: > On 15/02/2015 22:40, Rob wrote: >> I am experimenting with chrony 1.31 as an alternative on some PPS >> synchronized servers. It appears to run OK, it is tracking very nicely: > [] > > For me, there are two show-stoppers with Chrony: > > - no support for standard NTP monitoring commands.
?? There are chonyc which is its own monitoring. chrony is not ntpd, so why would you expect ntpc monitoring commands to work? > > - no support for ref-clocks on Windows. No support for windows at all, never mind refclocks. > > Like many others, I have built up a considerable monitoring architecture > based on using ntpq, in particular the ntpq -crv, and ntpq -pn > commands. Any replacement whether it be Chrony or ntimed would need to > address this. Remote monitoring is an essential requirement, and > compatibility with the installed base would be a huge advantage. > _______________________________________________ questions mailing list questions@lists.ntp.org http://lists.ntp.org/listinfo/questions
