That doesn’t look unreasonable. I get similar sequences at startup on the 
client.

What is your client ntp version? 

Don’t know if it is relevant, but if you want to open a bug you will have to 
upgrade to latest and try to reproduce there. 
     
> Le 21 mars 2019 à 15:52, Stefan K <shado...@gmx.net> a écrit :
> 
> Hello,
> 
> today I've to spend a little bit time for this, here are the tcpdump results, 
> it looks good to me:
> #client ask:
> Network Time Protocol (NTP Version 4, client)
>    Flags: 0xe3, Leap Indicator: unknown (clock unsynchronized), Version 
> number: NTP Version 4, Mode: client
>    Peer Clock Stratum: unspecified or invalid (0)
>    Peer Polling Interval: 6 (64 sec)
>    Peer Clock Precision: 0.000000 sec
>    Root Delay: 0 seconds
>    Root Dispersion: 0 seconds
>    Reference ID: (Initialization)
>    Reference Timestamp: Jan  1, 1970 00:00:00.000000000 UTC
>    Origin Timestamp: Jan  1, 1970 00:00:00.000000000 UTC
>    Receive Timestamp: Jan  1, 1970 00:00:00.000000000 UTC
>    Transmit Timestamp: Mar 21, 2019 14:23:59.184649604 UTC
> 
> #server answer:
> Network Time Protocol (NTP Version 4, server)
>    Flags: 0x24, Leap Indicator: no warning, Version number: NTP Version 4, 
> Mode: server
>    Peer Clock Stratum: secondary reference (3)
>    Peer Polling Interval: 6 (64 sec)
>    Peer Clock Precision: 0.000000 sec
>    Root Delay: 0.00921630859375 seconds
>    Root Dispersion: 0.020660400390625 seconds
>    Reference ID: 129.70.132.35
>    Reference Timestamp: Mar 21, 2019 14:23:51.562362183 UTC
>    Origin Timestamp: Mar 21, 2019 14:23:59.184649604 UTC
>    Receive Timestamp: Mar 21, 2019 14:23:59.170848067 UTC
>    Transmit Timestamp: Mar 21, 2019 14:23:59.170907972 UTC
> 
> At the moment I tried it with debian stretch as server, but the problem is 
> the same :(
> 
> 
> On Monday, March 18, 2019 5:18:32 PM CET Mike Cook wrote:
>> I don’t have these versions but I would suspect some DNS/routing issue. Have 
>> you tried tcpdump or other packet tracing to see if you are getting any ntp 
>> packets back. 
>> Your nmap response has an ip resolution for  timeserv.domain.ag as 
>> 194.94.xxx.xxx but this net dress is not used in the working config. 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>>> Le 11 mars 2019 à 12:38, Stefan K <shado...@gmx.net> a écrit :
>>> 
>>> nobody an idea?
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> On Tuesday, March 5, 2019 9:11:54 AM CET Stefan K wrote:
>>>> Hallo,
>>>> 
>>>> we have our own ntp-server which is running Ubuntu 14.04.LTS.
>>>> This Server works fine:
>>>> ntpq -pn
>>>>    remote           refid      st t when poll reach   delay   offset  
>>>> jitter
>>>> ==============================================================================
>>>> *178.63.9.110    129.69.1.153     2 u   56  128  377   22.658    0.249   
>>>> 0.053
>>>> -85.214.38.116   192.53.103.108   2 u   54  128  377    2.101   -5.105   
>>>> 0.051
>>>> +37.58.57.238    192.53.103.103   2 u   50  128  377   20.971    0.839   
>>>> 0.114
>>>> +94.130.76.108   192.53.103.108   2 u   56  128  377   24.007   -1.009   
>>>> 0.163
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> But on our Debian Strech server they all got Stratum16 and doesn't sync:
>>>> ntpq -p
>>>>    remote           refid      st t when poll reach   delay   offset  
>>>> jitter
>>>> ==============================================================================
>>>> timeserv.domain.ag .INIT.          16 u    - 1024    0    0.000    0.000   
>>>> 0.000
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> In Debian Jessie (and the same configuration/network) it works fine and 
>>>> get a Stratum3, also an 'ntpdate timeserv.domain.ag' works on Debian 
>>>> Stretch.
>>>> 
>>>> The firewall is not a problem, because with nmap and ntp-script it works 
>>>> fine:
>>>> nmap -sU -p 123 --script ntp-info timeserv.domain.ag
>>>> 
>>>> Starting Nmap 7.40 ( https://nmap.org ) at 2019-02-26 09:25 CET
>>>> Nmap scan report for timeserv.domain.ag (194.94.xxx.xxx)
>>>> Host is up (0.00017s latency).
>>>> PORT    STATE SERVICE
>>>> 123/udp open  ntp
>>>> | ntp-info: 
>>>> |   receive time stamp: 2019-02-26T08:26:05
>>>> |   version: ntpd 4.2.6p5@1.2349-o Fri Jul  6 20:19:54 UTC 2018 (1)
>>>> |   processor: x86_64
>>>> |   system: Linux/3.13.0-161-generic
>>>> |   leap: 0
>>>> |   stratum: 3
>>>> |   precision: -20
>>>> |   rootdelay: 31.589
>>>> |   rootdisp: 42.723
>>>> |   refid: 178.63.9.110
>>>> |   reftime: 0xe01f73ce.3608c5f7
>>>> |   clock: 0xe01f768f.e9bd2105
>>>> |   peer: 57654
>>>> |   tc: 10
>>>> |   mintc: 3
>>>> |   offset: 0.008
>>>> |   frequency: 27.593
>>>> |   sys_jitter: 1.020
>>>> |   clk_jitter: 0.180
>>>> |_  clk_wander: 0.014\x0D
>>>> Service Info: OS: Linux/3.13.0-161-generic
>>>> 
>>>> Nmap done: 1 IP address (1 host up) scanned in 13.75 seconds
>>>> 
>>>> and it also looks like that the client try to query the tnp-server because 
>>>> I can find the IP-Address of the Server under the section 'private 
>>>> clients':
>>>> nmap -sU -pU:123 -Pn -n --script=ntp-monlist timeserv.domain.ag
>>>> 
>>>> Can somebody help me with this issue?
>>>> 
>>>> Thanks in advance!
>>>> 
>>>> best regards 
>>>> Stefan
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> questions mailing list
>>>> questions@lists.ntp.org
>>>> http://lists.ntp.org/listinfo/questions
>>>> 
>>> 
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> questions mailing list
>>> questions@lists.ntp.org
>>> http://lists.ntp.org/listinfo/questions
>> 
>> "Ceux qui sont prêts à abandonner une liberté essentielle pour obtenir une 
>> petite et provisoire sécurité, ne méritent ni liberté ni sécurité."
>> Benjimin Franklin
>> 
>> 

"Ceux qui sont prêts à abandonner une liberté essentielle pour obtenir une 
petite et provisoire sécurité, ne méritent ni liberté ni sécurité."
Benjimin Franklin

_______________________________________________
questions mailing list
questions@lists.ntp.org
http://lists.ntp.org/listinfo/questions

Reply via email to