On 2019-08-14, Michael Haardt <mich...@moria.de> wrote: > keyid=0, ttl=0, offset=-21.688, delay=0.000, dispersion=199.450, > jitter=7.766, > filtdelay= 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00, > filtoffset= -21.69 -24.50 -21.05 -20.86 -24.06 -31.32 -18.34 -39.11, > filtdisp= 200.00 200.24 200.48 200.72 200.96 201.20 201.44 201.68 > > Indeed I used minjitter 0.2. > > I can't say that I understand the difference, though. Do I modify what > I should modify?
I think you do. To prevent the source from being rejected as a falseticker it needs to have a larger root distance. That could be from a larger dispersion or delay. You modified the refclock jitter, which ends up in the peer dispersion (after some weighting). Another approach would be to specify a minimum for the peer dispersion directly. There could be also an option to specify a minimum delay. But adjusting it in the refclock specific code, as you did, makes perfect sense to me. -- Miroslav Lichvar _______________________________________________ questions mailing list questions@lists.ntp.org http://lists.ntp.org/listinfo/questions
