Hi, On 2020-10-20, at 16:46, Mirja Kuehlewind <[email protected]> wrote: > > I guess the requirement for this are that QUIC can use two paths > simultaneously and that data send within one stream but transmitted over two > paths are delivered in order.
I think this is exactly at the level of detail that is useful at this stage, and nicely identifies what QUICv1 can and cannot do. > Not sure what other requirements you would expect to see at this stage? I don't expect anything :-) It's up the proponents of the different use cases to state their requirements in this way. If ATSSS required nothing else than what you stated above, you'd be done. Thanks, Lars
signature.asc
Description: Message signed with OpenPGP
