Hi, Mikkel, On Thu, Nov 12, 2020 at 7:38 AM Mikkel Fahnøe Jørgensen <[email protected]> wrote:
> ISTM that we are wobbling between "true multipath is easier to track" and > "connection migration is the weakest form of multipath, so if multipath is > trackable, so is connection migration", and I wonder if someone could point > me to an analysis of "how to avoid tracking for connection migration" - one > strategy I've learned a lot about at/since the virtual interim was > validating multiple paths early in the life of a connection, so that > failover can happen quickly, for instance. > > In that light true MP could be less trackable than migration because you > can avoid the synchronization of traffic stopping on one connection when > another picks up. For ordinary migration you could also use MP to phase in > the new connection gradually if the old one keeps working somewhat. > That's the way I thought it would work, but wanted to ask. Thanks for your thoughts. Best, Spencer
