Hi Sarah, thanks for the review! Since the QUIC WG uses a Github Workflow I've created a separate issue for each of the items in your review and tagged you in it, see in-line responses for the precise issue link. All issues are tracked in the milestone https://github.com/quicwg/base-drafts/milestone/13
Since there are no issues raised, the single ticket at https://github.com/quicwg/base-drafts/issues/4367 is already closed. Thanks, Lars > On 2020-11-16, at 18:47, Sarah Banks via Datatracker <[email protected]> wrote: > > Reviewer: Sarah Banks > Review result: Ready > > Hi, > I have reviewed this document as part of the Operational directorate's > ongoing effort to review all IETF documents being processed by the IESG. > These comments were written with the intent of improving the operational > aspects of the IETF drafts. Comments that are not addressed in last call > may be included in AD reviews during the IESG review. Document editors and > WG chairs should treat these comments just like any other last call > comments. > > Status: Ready for publication > > Overall, I found this to be a very well written document. For a doc that > tracks at ~65 pages, I couldn't find any critiques, short of editorial > nits here and there. It reads as "thoughtful", and as if it's had the many > reviews and eyeballs on it as it seems to have had. I also appreciated the > feedback and advice regarding performance. A big thank you to the authors, > the WG, and the reviewers who pitched in; your effort shows. > > Thanks > Sarah > > > -- > last-call mailing list > [email protected] > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/last-call
signature.asc
Description: Message signed with OpenPGP
