Hi, On Tue, Nov 17, 2020 at 4:35 PM Behcet Sarikaya <[email protected]> wrote:
> > On Tue, Nov 17, 2020 at 10:28 AM Ron Bonica via Datatracker < > [email protected]> wrote: > >> Reviewer: Ron Bonica >> Review result: Ready >> >> Amazingly complete. I am sure that a naive implementer can code from this. >> >> >> > You nailed it Ron. > > I think this is a problem generally in Quic specs. > They are written for implementers. > > I read Ron's comment as a compliment, not a complaint. A protocol specification should not be an implementation spec. > I think this is a deep issue maybe most Quic people do not appreciate > because it seems those people are mostly implementers. > > The specs have been in development since the QUIC WG was chartered in 2016. Can you point me to the GitHub issues that were raised to address the deep issues you hint at? Now is a great time to remind people that the WG is in parallel working on draft-ietf-quic-manageability [1], its intended audience is network operators and I'm sure that Mirja and Brian would appreciate more reviews. Cheers Lucas QUIC WG Co-chair [1] - https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-quic-manageability-08 > >
