Great work.

From a quick read, I believe you have captured many relevant use cases but 
perhaps the document does not capture the concerns related til NAT translation 
and firewalls.

There is a diagram showing multiple paths between two QUIC hosts A and B, and I 
think that is great because traffic between two data center hosts is a great 
use case IMO. But here hosts can mean anything, also a mobile client or a user 
at home or at work behind a NAT router.
The use cases and trade-offs differ significantly in these separate 
configurations, and the problems are also different in that it can be hard to 
maintain or initiate a path in reverse direction of a NAT.

Apologies if you already made that clear in a section that I missed.


> On 7 Jan 2021, at 04.26, Spencer Dawkins at IETF 
> <[email protected]> wrote:
> 
> Dear QUIC WG, 
> 
> I'ave gotten some feedback on this draft from several people, including 
> several presenters at the QUIC multipath virtual interim last October. 
> 
> See the diffs for details. 
> 
> Just to be clear on something that's probably confusing - I'm trying to 
> capture what people are trying to do with multipath, based largely, but not 
> completely, on the presentations available at 
> https://datatracker.ietf.org/meeting/interim-2020-quic-02/session/quic 
> <https://datatracker.ietf.org/meeting/interim-2020-quic-02/session/quic>. So 
> I'm trying to capture the state of play as we started having a serious 
> discussion about multipath. 
> 
> I'm also working on a draft that tries to identify the questions we've had 
> come up in working group discussions. I'll probably submit an update on that 
> draft tomorrow or Friday. 
> 
> I hope these are helpful as we move things along. 
> 
> Best,
> 
> Spencer
> 
> ---------- Forwarded message ---------
> From: <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>>
> Date: Wed, Jan 6, 2021 at 9:18 PM
> Subject: New Version Notification for 
> draft-dawkins-quic-what-to-do-with-multipath-03.txt
> To: Spencer Dawkins <[email protected] 
> <mailto:[email protected]>>
> 
> 
> 
> A new version of I-D, draft-dawkins-quic-what-to-do-with-multipath-03.txt
> has been successfully submitted by Spencer Dawkins and posted to the
> IETF repository.
> 
> Name:           draft-dawkins-quic-what-to-do-with-multipath
> Revision:       03
> Title:          What To Do With Multiple Active Paths in QUIC
> Document date:  2021-01-06
> Group:          Individual Submission
> Pages:          14
> URL:            
> https://www.ietf.org/archive/id/draft-dawkins-quic-what-to-do-with-multipath-03.txt
>  
> <https://www.ietf.org/archive/id/draft-dawkins-quic-what-to-do-with-multipath-03.txt>
> Status:         
> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-dawkins-quic-what-to-do-with-multipath/
>  
> <https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-dawkins-quic-what-to-do-with-multipath/>
> Htmlized:       
> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-dawkins-quic-what-to-do-with-multipath
>  
> <https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-dawkins-quic-what-to-do-with-multipath>
> Htmlized:       
> https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-dawkins-quic-what-to-do-with-multipath-03 
> <https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-dawkins-quic-what-to-do-with-multipath-03>
> Diff:           
> https://www.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url2=draft-dawkins-quic-what-to-do-with-multipath-03
>  
> <https://www.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url2=draft-dawkins-quic-what-to-do-with-multipath-03>
> 
> Abstract:
>    The IETF QUIC working group has been chartered to produce extensions
>    that would "enable ... multipath capabilities" since the working
>    group was formed in 2016, but because multipath was an extension,
>    work on multipath, and the other extensions named in the charter,
>    waited while work proceeded on the core QUIC protocol specifications.
> 
>    After the QUIC working group chairs requested publication for the
>    core QUIC protocol specifications, they scheduled a virtual interim
>    meeting to understand the use cases that various groups inside and
>    outside the IETF were envisioning for multipath with QUIC.
> 
>    As part of that discussion, it became obvious that people had a
>    variety of ideas about how multiple paths would be used, because they
>    weren't looking at the same use cases.
> 
>    This document is intended to capture that variety of ideas, to inform
>    further discussion in the working group.
> 
> 
> 
> 
> Please note that it may take a couple of minutes from the time of submission
> until the htmlized version and diff are available at tools.ietf.org 
> <http://tools.ietf.org/>.
> 
> The IETF Secretariat
> 
> 

Reply via email to