Sorry, the following text is out of context - it was a suggestion that I decided not to persue.
> On 12 Jan 2021, at 01.10, Mikkel Fahnøe Jørgensen <[email protected]> wrote: > > If the DCID is not understood by the LB, the LB chooses a random target > server but does not store any state. The expectation being that the server > will assign its own DCID on the return path. > > The LB will understand how to route the server assigned DCID. The problem > being that this generally requires shared state - which Low-Config aims to > avoid in exchange of local state. >
