Hi Julian, I believe the intent was to request expedited processing on the QUIC docs. Maybe that doesn't make any sense if we're waiting for HTTP/3 -- or maybe we'll ship one without the other. That's what I'm waiting to clarify.
On Mon, Jan 11, 2021 at 1:13 PM Julian Reschke <[email protected]> wrote: > Am 11.01.2021 um 21:56 schrieb Martin Duke: > > I was disappointed to realize that quic-http has two normative > > references (httpbis-cache and https-semantics) that are not even in WGLC. > > We are trying to get to WGLC in the next few days. > > > This suggests that there will be significant delay (best case, months) > > between QUIC and HTTP/3 finalizing as RFCs. > > In theory, once all of the specs are in the RFC Editor Queue, the IESG > could ask the RPC nicely to fast-track the HTTP specs so that they do > not delay the QUIC specs. > > > ... > > Best regards, Julian > >
