Hi Éric, Thanks for the review. I've created GitHub issue(s) to track each comment on the QUIC WG repository, see the URL(s) in line.
On Wed, Jan 20, 2021 at 9:17 AM Éric Vyncke via Datatracker < [email protected]> wrote: > Éric Vyncke has entered the following ballot position for > draft-ietf-quic-qpack-20: No Objection > > When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all > email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this > introductory paragraph, however.) > > > Please refer to https://www.ietf.org/iesg/statement/discuss-criteria.html > for more information about IESG DISCUSS and COMMENT positions. > > > The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here: > https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-quic-qpack/ > > > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > COMMENT: > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Thank you for the work put into this document. To be honest, I find it > really > interesting to read. > > I have only one generic comment, did the WG look into the Static Context > Header > Compression out of the LPWAN WG ? As there are similarities. > > https://github.com/quicwg/base-drafts/issues/4774 Cheers Lucas On behalf of QUIC WG Chairs
