Hi, On 2021-1-29, at 2:03, Spencer Dawkins at IETF <[email protected]> wrote: > I THINK I'm reading this as the QUIC working group requesting groups that > realize that their applications require QUIC extensions to consult with the > QUIC working group, and seek review. Is that the intention?
yes. > I'd expect that to be stronger, simply because (based on experiences with > protocols like SIP) popular protocols tend to collect applications from > people who don't understand the underlying protocol as well as the people who > are responsible for the underlying protocol. If you can say "but you can > accomplish the same thing by using QUIC as it is now", sooner rather than > later, that would probably make everyone's lives simpler. ... > So, maybe that could say something like "are encouraged to consult with the > QUIC WG and obtain early review of proposals, thereby avoiding late > surprises"? I'm proposing a text change based on this suggestion in https://github.com/quicwg/wg-materials/pull/192/files#r566650407 Thanks, Lars
signature.asc
Description: Message signed with OpenPGP
