Thanks, If anyone have issues with these changes please raise them prior to 17th of February. I intended to approve the documents then if no issues have been raised.
Cheers Magnus On Wed, 2021-02-03 at 00:32 +0000, Lucas Pardue wrote: > Hello, > > In response to the IESG Review of the QUIC WG -http and -qpack documents, > individual GitHub issues were opened and the documents moved to the "Revised > I-D Needed" state. > > The editors have been hard at work triaging and responding to the issues. > Thanks to a concerted effort, most of the issues have already been resolved. > Some were deemed to require no action and have been closed, some were > Editorial issues that have been addressed by PRs that have been merged into > the working copies. The remaining issues have been identified as Design > issues, see > https://github.com/quicwg/base-drafts/issues?q=is%3Aissue+is%3Aopen+label%3Acall-issued+label%3A-http > and > https://github.com/quicwg/base-drafts/issues?q=is%3Aissue+is%3Aopen+label%3Acall-issued+label%3A-qpack > > In line with how we handled resolving the last set of IESG design issues, > rather than issue a WG consensus call, the editors have published new drafts > -http-34 and -qpack-21. These address the Design issues listed below by > incorporating the associated proposed resolutions. This email serves to boost > the visibility of these Design issues, now marked with a "call-issued" label, > in order to allow the WG and the IESG to comment on the proposed resolutions. > Note however that at this late stage, if the WG push back against issues > discussed between editors, ADs and IESG members, we risk invalidating the > review and needing to start over. > > * HTTP/3 authority diverged from SEMANTICS - > https://github.com/quicwg/base-drafts/issues/4761 > The proposed resolution is https://github.com/quicwg/base-drafts/pull/4808 > > * Roman Danyliw's HTTP/3 Comment 1 - > https://github.com/quicwg/base-drafts/issues/4763 > The proposed resolution is https://github.com/quicwg/base-drafts/pull/4808 > > * Roman Danyliw's HTTP/3 Comment 2 - > https://github.com/quicwg/base-drafts/issues/4764 > The proposed resolution is https://github.com/quicwg/base-drafts/pull/4808 > > * Mandating use of CN-ID is not modern practice (aka Ben's HTTP/3 Discuss 1) - > https://github.com/quicwg/base-drafts/issues/4769 > The proposed resolution is https://github.com/quicwg/base-drafts/pull/4808 > > * Ben Kaduk's HTTP/3 Discuss 2 - > https://github.com/quicwg/base-drafts/issues/4775 > The proposed resolution is https://github.com/quicwg/base-drafts/pull/4808 > > * Ben Kaduk's HTTP/3 Comment 4 - > https://github.com/quicwg/base-drafts/issues/4779 > The proposed resolution is close with no design change but make the > editorial improvement https://github.com/quicwg/base-drafts/pull/4819 > > * Defer to core HTTP for 421 status code - > https://github.com/quicwg/base-drafts/issues/4790 > The proposed resolution is https://github.com/quicwg/base-drafts/pull/4808 > > Cheers > Lars, Lucas & Matt > QUIC WG Co-chairs
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature
