I have just completed a review of the applicability draft ( draft-ietf-quic-applicability-09).  I saw quite a few places where the text would really benefit from some clarity to avoid potential misreading, but I expect most of this work is editorial (see Issue #205).

In general this looks like a useful document that I think should be published by the WG after resolving the issues in WGLC. I recorded the following WGLC issues in github.

Best wishes,

Gorry

===

App/Ops: Server deployments with load balancers <https://github.com/quicwg/ops-drafts/issues/206> #206 opened1 minute agobygorryfair <https://github.com/quicwg/ops-drafts/issues?q=is%3Aissue+is%3Aopen+author%3Agorryfair>

App: Ref: Transport BEHAVE Specs <https://github.com/quicwg/ops-drafts/issues/204> #204 opened11 minutes agobygorryfair <https://github.com/quicwg/ops-drafts/issues?q=is%3Aissue+is%3Aopen+author%3Agorryfair> App: Ref: TAPS API work: on TCP fallback / API? <https://github.com/quicwg/ops-drafts/issues/203> #203 opened12 minutes agobygorryfair <https://github.com/quicwg/ops-drafts/issues?q=is%3Aissue+is%3Aopen+author%3Agorryfair> App: Ref: Sect 1: Cite RFC8055 here? <https://github.com/quicwg/ops-drafts/issues/202> #202 opened13 minutes agobygorryfair <https://github.com/quicwg/ops-drafts/issues?q=is%3Aissue+is%3Aopen+author%3Agorryfair>
1 <https://github.com/quicwg/ops-drafts/issues/202>
App: Sec 14: Security Considerations reference to transport BCP? <https://github.com/quicwg/ops-drafts/issues/201> #201 opened14 minutes agobygorryfair <https://github.com/quicwg/ops-drafts/issues?q=is%3Aissue+is%3Aopen+author%3Agorryfair> App: Use (and do not need to use) of ICMP <https://github.com/quicwg/ops-drafts/issues/200> #200 opened17 minutes agobygorryfair <https://github.com/quicwg/ops-drafts/issues?q=is%3Aissue+is%3Aopen+author%3Agorryfair> App: Section 12 on Versioning<https://github.com/quicwg/ops-drafts/issues/199> #199 opened19 minutes agobygorryfair <https://github.com/quicwg/ops-drafts/issues?q=is%3Aissue+is%3Aopen+author%3Agorryfair> App: Ref: Should the text ion DSCP also cite RFC7657? <https://github.com/quicwg/ops-drafts/issues/198> #198 opened21 minutes agobygorryfair <https://github.com/quicwg/ops-drafts/issues?q=is%3Aissue+is%3Aopen+author%3Agorryfair> App: What does "prime a CC" mean? <https://github.com/quicwg/ops-drafts/issues/197> #197 opened22 minutes agobygorryfair <https://github.com/quicwg/ops-drafts/issues?q=is%3Aissue+is%3Aopen+author%3Agorryfair> App: ... interference by network elements such as firewalls <https://github.com/quicwg/ops-drafts/issues/196> #196 opened24 minutes agobygorryfair <https://github.com/quicwg/ops-drafts/issues?q=is%3Aissue+is%3Aopen+author%3Agorryfair> App: Port Usage uses RFC2119 word? <https://github.com/quicwg/ops-drafts/issues/195> #195 opened25 minutes agobygorryfair <https://github.com/quicwg/ops-drafts/issues?q=is%3Aissue+is%3Aopen+author%3Agorryfair> Padding explanation needs to mention DPLPMTUD <https://github.com/quicwg/ops-drafts/issues/194> #194 opened26 minutes agobygorryfair <https://github.com/quicwg/ops-drafts/issues?q=is%3Aissue+is%3Aopen+author%3Agorryfair> App: Sect 4.3. Flow Control - we should have a subsection also encouraging timely credits <https://github.com/quicwg/ops-drafts/issues/193> #193 opened27 minutes agobygorryfair <https://github.com/quicwg/ops-drafts/issues?q=is%3Aissue+is%3Aopen+author%3Agorryfair> App: End of Sect 2: RFC2119 Keyword? <https://github.com/quicwg/ops-drafts/issues/192>



Reply via email to