Google won't be able to deploy this server-side until we drop support for some older Google QUIC versions, but I still support adoption.
David On Wed, Mar 31, 2021 at 12:55 AM Roberto Peon <[email protected]> wrote: > Strongly agreed that adoption is the path that makes sense. > -=R > > On 3/30/21, 8:19 PM, "QUIC on behalf of Sean Turner" < > [email protected] on behalf of [email protected]> wrote: > > I am a fan of grease. Let’s adopt it. > > spt > > > On Mar 30, 2021, at 15:41, Matt Joras <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > Hello all, > > > > As with the other mail we are looking at moving candidates for > > adoption forward. It is the opinion of the chairs that the QUIC bit > > grease draft[1] has sufficient interest from and relevance to the WG > > to be formally adopted. This email is the call to do so. There are > > already several interoperating implementations of the current draft. > > Please reply to this email with any comments, the call will run > > through April 6th. > > > > Thanks, > > QUIC Chairs > > > > [1] https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-thomson-quic-bit-grease/ > > > > >
