Events without label "editorial"
Issues
------
* quicwg/base-drafts (+2/-3/💬2)
2 issues created:
- What does GREASE mean for error codes? (by vasilvv)
https://github.com/quicwg/base-drafts/issues/4857
- There is not a singular application protocol error code space (by LPardue)
https://github.com/quicwg/base-drafts/issues/4856
1 issues received 2 new comments:
- #4857 What does GREASE mean for error codes? (2 by LPardue, vasilvv)
https://github.com/quicwg/base-drafts/issues/4857
3 issues closed:
- Transport: Receiver/sender wording for MAX_STREAMS https://github.com/quicwg/base-drafts/issues/4849 [-transport]
- Loss recovery pseudocode can erroneously set PTO in the past https://github.com/quicwg/base-drafts/issues/4846 [-recovery]
- What does GREASE mean for error codes? https://github.com/quicwg/base-drafts/issues/4857
* quicwg/ops-drafts (+0/-3/💬1)
1 issues received 1 new comments:
- #283 Clarify Stream ID assignment (1 by mirjak)
https://github.com/quicwg/ops-drafts/issues/283 [-applicability]
3 issues closed:
- Stronger caution on using CID https://github.com/quicwg/ops-drafts/issues/293 [-manageability] [UDP Filtering]
- Recommendation about using 4-tuple for NAT https://github.com/quicwg/ops-drafts/issues/295 [-manageability] [UDP Filtering]
- Applicability could say more about ALPN https://github.com/quicwg/ops-drafts/issues/292 [-applicability] [editor-ready]
* quicwg/load-balancers (+2/-3/💬2)
2 issues created:
- Confused about `AEAD Checksum` in retry token (by william-zk)
https://github.com/quicwg/load-balancers/issues/108
- More text on configuration sharing (by martinduke)
https://github.com/quicwg/load-balancers/issues/107
2 issues received 2 new comments:
- #108 Confused about `AEAD Checksum` in retry token (1 by martinduke)
https://github.com/quicwg/load-balancers/issues/108
- #99 Consider an alternative name to 'arbitrary' algorithm (1 by martinduke)
https://github.com/quicwg/load-balancers/issues/99
3 issues closed:
- Consider an alternative name to 'arbitrary' algorithm https://github.com/quicwg/load-balancers/issues/99
- Consider an alternative name to 'non-compliant' https://github.com/quicwg/load-balancers/issues/98
- Confused about `AEAD Checksum` in retry token https://github.com/quicwg/load-balancers/issues/108
Pull requests
-------------
* quicwg/base-drafts (+1/-0/💬1)
1 pull requests submitted:
- Merge text on what not to send in response to ACKs (by ianswett)
https://github.com/quicwg/base-drafts/pull/4855
1 pull requests received 1 new comments:
- #4855 Merge text on what not to send in response to ACKs (1 by janaiyengar)
https://github.com/quicwg/base-drafts/pull/4855
* quicwg/ops-drafts (+1/-5/💬8)
1 pull requests submitted:
- Suggestions from review of #300 (by ianswett)
https://github.com/quicwg/ops-drafts/pull/309
4 pull requests received 8 new comments:
- #309 Remove details on using CID to associate flows (2 by ianswett, mirjak)
https://github.com/quicwg/ops-drafts/pull/309 [proposed-to-not-merge]
- #308 Reference cleanup (1 by mirjak)
https://github.com/quicwg/ops-drafts/pull/308
- #299 Try to make flow control consuming and processing crisper (2 by LPardue, gorryfair)
https://github.com/quicwg/ops-drafts/pull/299
- #222 UDP Timeout text (3 by britram, ianswett, mirjak)
https://github.com/quicwg/ops-drafts/pull/222 [-manageability] [meeting-agenda]
5 pull requests merged:
- Make recommendation to not CID for NAT stronger
https://github.com/quicwg/ops-drafts/pull/306
- Additional text on problem with 4-tuple for stateful devices
https://github.com/quicwg/ops-drafts/pull/307
- Reference cleanup
https://github.com/quicwg/ops-drafts/pull/308 [ready-to-merge]
- add reference to draft-ietf-quic-version-negotiation
https://github.com/quicwg/ops-drafts/pull/304
- More ALPN discussion
https://github.com/quicwg/ops-drafts/pull/302
* quicwg/datagram (+2/-0/💬3)
2 pull requests submitted:
- Explain the lack of flow IDs, and suggest a pattern (by tfpauly)
https://github.com/quicwg/datagram/pull/20
- Clarify meaning of 0 in the datagram transport parameter (by tfpauly)
https://github.com/quicwg/datagram/pull/19
1 pull requests received 3 new comments:
- #19 Clarify meaning of 0 in the datagram transport parameter (3 by Ralith,
tfpauly)
https://github.com/quicwg/datagram/pull/19
* quicwg/load-balancers (+2/-1/💬0)
2 pull requests submitted:
- More text on tenants that share an IP (by martinduke)
https://github.com/quicwg/load-balancers/pull/110
- Replace "non-compliant" and "arbitrary" (by martinduke)
https://github.com/quicwg/load-balancers/pull/109
1 pull requests merged:
- Replace "non-compliant" and "arbitrary"
https://github.com/quicwg/load-balancers/pull/109
Repositories tracked by this digest:
-----------------------------------
* https://github.com/quicwg/base-drafts
* https://github.com/quicwg/ops-drafts
* https://github.com/quicwg/datagram
* https://github.com/quicwg/load-balancers
* https://github.com/quicwg/version-negotiation
