Hi David,

On Thu, May 6, 2021 at 5:38 PM David Schinazi <[email protected]>
wrote:

>
>
> On Thu, May 6, 2021 at 7:54 AM Lucas Pardue <[email protected]>
> wrote:
>
>> This email commences a formal consensus call for permitting the
>> deployment of QUIC "0x00000001" with HTTP/3 ALPN identifier "h3" *after*
>> -invariants, -transport, -tls, and -recovery have been published as RFCs
>> but *before *-http and -qpack are published as RFC. The call will end on
>> May 13.
>>
>
> Hi Lucas, since this is a formal consensus call, can you formally define
> what you meant by "deployment"? Some clarifying questions:
> - Is running a 1% experiment on clients before then OK?
> - Is running a 1% experiment on servers before then OK?
> - Is running 0x00000001+h3 on your main production server today OK if you
> don't use Alt-Svc?
> What we're describing is effectively a flag day, and it would be good to
> define its parameters clearly.
>

These are excellent questions. So far the WG discussion has focused on the
0x00000001+h3 question. There is ambiguity in the transport-34 and http-34
definition of deployment and to date there wasn't much discussion of that.
The chairs would appreciate the WG to respond specifically to this point.

Cheers
Lucas

Reply via email to