Hello all, Hearing no objections or further discussion, we consider there to be consensus that this is alright to do.
Thanks, QUIC Chairs On Tue, May 4, 2021 at 3:33 PM Matt Joras <[email protected]> wrote: > > Hello all, > > It is the opinion of the chairs and the editors that this is something > worth fixing with IANA. We are using this email to make a call for any > objections to this change at this stage. This call will run through > May 11th. Please reply with any concerns or further discussion. > > Thanks, > QUIC Chairs > > On Mon, May 3, 2021 at 5:55 PM Martin Thomson <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > Most of our registries reserve the short varint values (0x00-0x3f) for > > RFCs. We didn't do that for transport parameters. > > > > Is there any reason why we should not ask IANA to change this? The RFC > > editor noted the discrepancy and I can't say that it was deliberate. > > > > It is probably an accident. Remember that we only changed the format of > > transport parameters fairly late in the process and so we probably missed > > this when that happened. > > > > I would like to ask IANA to tweak the registry policies here, but that > > means we need to be careful. Minimally, that means AD approval (Hi Zahed). > > > > See https://github.com/quicwg/base-drafts/issues/4880 for an issue. > > > > https://github.com/quicwg/base-drafts/pull/4887/commits/7e4f0f1ee11db09d7bda5617de51ec06f1b34d24 > > does this (it's attached to > > https://github.com/quicwg/base-drafts/pull/4887 but that pulls in other > > changes). > >
