Slicing it down to a minimum:
On Aug 6, 2021, at 7:31 AM, Robin MARX <robin.marx=40uhasselt...@dmarc.ietf.org> wrote: > With regards to having a canonical serialization format (JSON) or canonical > data definition (as Lucas said, probably CDDL-based), I personally have a > very large preference for the latter. Excellent! We agree. It is still good to have the eventual JSON serialization format in the documents, because it will be the easiest to grok for those of us who are "learn by example". If this is the way the WG goes, I volunteer to do a CBOR serialization. If the WG loves it so much that it also puts it into the documents, great, but if not, it can easily be a standalone document that developed in parallel with the data-definition-plus-JSON document. I also volunteer to help with the JSON, if needed (I was previoulsy co-chair if the JSON WG). --Paul Hoffman
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature
