Hi, Lucas and Matt, On Thu, Sep 16, 2021 at 3:35 PM Lucas Pardue <[email protected]> wrote:
> Hello QUIC WG, > > This email starts the Working Group Last Call for "An Unreliable Datagram > Extension to QUIC", located at: > https://www.ietf.org/archive/id/draft-ietf-quic-datagram-04.html > > Please take time to review it carefully and raise any remaining issues you > see either on the GitHub repo issues list[1] or on this mailing list. > I've re-read the discussion in https://github.com/quicwg/datagram/issues/6, and now better understand the points of view that resulted in the lack of datagram multiplexing in this specification (I was following that discussion when it was happening, but hindsight during re-reading helped a lot!) I especially appreciate the addition of the text in https://www.ietf.org/archive/id/draft-ietf-quic-datagram-04.html#name-multiplexing-datagrams . I accept the wisdom of getting more experience with various people using application-defined multiplexing in various ways before adding any flavor of multiplexing at the transport layer, and agree that holding this specification up while that experience is gathered, would not be The Right Thing To Do. I'm aware of at least two "RTP over QUIC" proposals that assume that they'll need to multiplex datagrams, so I won't be surprised if we return to this question in the future, but for now, the chairs are Doing The Right Thing, and I support requesting publication of -04 (modulo any changes that pop up in WGLC, of course). Best, Spencer > Working Group Last Call will end on 30 September 2021, Anywhere on Earth. > > Best Regards, > Matt & Lucas > QUIC WG Chairs > > [1] https://github.com/quicwg/datagram/issues >
