Hello QUIC enthusiasts, I would like to remind you of the QUICv2 individual draft: https://github.com/martinduke/draft-duke-quic-v2
This draft spurred some interesting questions about ALPN and version numbering conventions that we briefly discussed at IETF 111, but didn't resolve. Discussion here: https://youtu.be/R7q8cWIAIDQ?t=6233, although I've closed the issue in github <https://github.com/martinduke/draft-duke-quic-v2/issues/5> for now. There has been loose talk in the past about shipping a v2 relatively quickly for various reasons. The draft is pretty simple, and I suspect there's not much more polishing to be done -- but I've been surprised before! So, if people are interested in doing this, let's adopt it. If no one actually wants to deploy it, I'll stop working on it. Thoughts? Do we need to discuss it at IETF 112? Or is there a reason to defer an adoption call? Martin
