> On Nov 15, 2021, at 19:24, Kazuho Oku <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>
>
> 2021年11月15日(月) 9:02 Martin Thomson <[email protected]>:
> Adopt it. The scope as stated by Matt and Marten is where I'd like to see
> this stay.
>
> +1.
+1
spt
> On Sat, Nov 13, 2021, at 04:28, Matt Joras wrote:
> > Hello all,
> >
> > As discussed at the WG meeting, this draft[1] provides an "identical"
> > version of QUIC under a new version alias. The chairs believe it is an
> > opportune time to propose adoption, and this email serves as that
> > call. We believe this to be useful work for the working group to take
> > on, especially in the context of the already-adopted and ongoing
> > version negotiation work[2]. Please reply to this email with any
> > comments. The call will run through November 19th.
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Matt & Lucas
> > QUIC Chairs
> >
> > [1] https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-duke-quic-v2/
> > [2] https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-quic-version-negotiation/
