> On Feb 2, 2022, at 12:36 PM, Tommy Pauly <[email protected]> wrote:
> 
> Thanks for the review! Responses inline.

Thanks. Clearer now. Agreed that given the “flag” thing is how RFC 9000 does 
things, consistency is worthwhile.[*]

—John

[*] I can’t resist pointing out that RFC 9000 has three, presumably orthogonal, 
flags, which means that document’s presentation is clearer that way since it 
doesn’t have to have a table or something, listing the behavior of the eight 
different type codes — but in your case you just have one flag so there’s no 
actual savings in presentation. Still, conceded that taken in context of RFC 
9000, your point stands.

Reply via email to