Ines, thank you for your review. I have entered a No Objection ballot for this 
document.

Lars


> On 2022-2-8, at 2:03, Ines Robles via Datatracker <[email protected]> wrote:
> 
> Reviewer: Ines Robles
> Review result: Ready with Issues
> 
> I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. The General Area
> Review Team (Gen-ART) reviews all IETF documents being processed
> by the IESG for the IETF Chair.  Please treat these comments just
> like any other last call comments.
> 
> For more information, please see the FAQ at
> 
> <https://trac.ietf.org/trac/gen/wiki/GenArtfaq>.
> 
> Document: draft-ietf-quic-applicability-14
> Reviewer: Ines Robles
> Review Date: 2022-02-07
> IETF LC End Date: 2022-02-07
> IESG Telechat date: Not scheduled for a telechat
> 
> Summary:
> 
> This document discusses the applicability of the QUIC transport protocol,
> focusing on caveats impacting application protocol  development and deployment
> over QUIC.  The document is well written and clear.
> 
> I have one minor issue.
> 
> Major issues: None
> 
> Minor issues:
> 
> Section 2 on the sentence:
> 
> "While recent measurements have shown no evidence of a widespread,  systematic
> disadvantage of UDP traffic compared to TCP in the Internet"
> 
> Statement of "no evidence of a widespread,  systematic disadvantage" may be
> seen as misleading when the example is about networks that simply block UDP
> traffic without considering other possible disadvantages, moreover when one of
> the references specifically states the opposite "3% failure is a lot".
> Additionally references are rather old (2016) materials. Suggestion for
> avoidance of doubt:
> 
> "Measurements have shown 3-5% of networks blocking UDP, constituting a
> disadvantage of UDP traffic compared to TCP in the Internet [Edeline16],
> [Trammell16] [Swett16].  All applications running on top of QUIC must
> therefore..."
> 
> Nits: None
> 
> Thanks for this document,
> Ines.
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Gen-art mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Message signed with OpenPGP

Reply via email to