Yes, apologies for the expiration, the work has not been abandoned. Thanks, Ian
On Sat, Apr 30, 2022 at 3:47 PM Lucas Pardue <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi Christian, > > On Sat, 30 Apr 2022, 20:10 Christian Huitema, <[email protected]> wrote: > >> The datatracker says: >> *This Internet-Draft is no longer active. A copy of the expired >> Internet-Draft can be found at:* >> https://www.ietf.org/archive/id/draft-ietf-quic-ack-frequency-01.txt >> <https://www.ietf.org/archive/id/draft-ietf-quic-ack-frequency-01.txt> >> >> -- Christian Huitema >> > > Thanks for asking. The answer is no, the work has not been abandoned. > Rather, the draft expired naturally due to the standard 6 month validity > period expiring. > > The current document situation is unfortunate. The editors have indicated > to the chairs that an updated draft will be issued soon. > > The chairs would like to remind all editors of QUIC documents to keep > their drafts alive, in order to avoid these sorts of situations. If there > are circumstances that make that difficult, please get in touch with us at > the earliest opportunity. > > Kind regards, > Lucas > On behalf of the QUIC WG Chairs > > >
