Hello all,

Martin and me has chatted about the 7 day rule and it appeared that not 
following the rule would actually lead to connection failure. Hence, this 
actually should be a MUST. See the pull request 
https://github.com/quicwg/quic-bit-grease/pull/24 
<https://github.com/quicwg/quic-bit-grease/pull/24>. 

Please reflect on this change by the end of next week (20th May, 2022) along 
with any thoughts regarding the 7 (day) number. Unless any critical issue 
found, after that I will consider the AD review issues are resolved and move 
the doc to IETF LC.

//Zahed


> On 28 Apr 2022, at 04:33, Martin Thomson <[email protected]> wrote:
> 
> Thanks Zahed.
> 
> I've added references as you suggest and reworded some of the intro (fewer 
> words!)
> 
> You asked about the 7 day thing, which is almost entirely arbitrary.  QUIC 
> doesn't time limit NEW_TOKEN in any way, so this time is only necessary to 
> avoid unbounded use of the mechanism (which might prevent a server from ever 
> disabling greasing).  It's aligned with TLS requirements for session tickets, 
> because that is likely natural for client implementations, but it is still 
> ultimately an arbitrary value.  We can say that much, but I don't think we 
> need to.
> 
> On Wed, Apr 27, 2022, at 20:09, Zaheduzzaman Sarker wrote:
>> Hi,
>> 
>> Thanks for the short and nice draft.
>> 
>> I have done my AD review. I haven’t noticed any technical issues so 
>> far. However, I have some editorial comments and I have created issues 
>> for those 
>> (https://protect2.fireeye.com/v1/url?k=31323334-501d5122-313273af-454445555731-bfd564275429d53b&q=1&e=47a1b565-597e-492d-a7c0-c2291d74fae4&u=https%3A%2F%2Fgithub.com%2Fquicwg%2Fquic-bit-grease%2Fissues).
>>  
>> 
>> //Zahed
>> Attachments:
>> * smime.p7s

Attachment: smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature

Reply via email to